Model Relasi Agama dan Negara dalam Konteks Keindonesiaan: Telaah Pemikiran Nurcholish Madjid dan Abdurrahman Wahid
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47281/fas.v6i2.240Keywords:
Religion, State, Democracy, Ethical-Substantive Approach, IndonesiaAbstract
This study aims to explore models of the relationship between religion and the state in the Indonesian context by examining the thoughts of two prominent moderate Muslim intellectuals: Nurcholish Madjid and Abdurrahman Wahid. Utilizing a qualitative method through library research and content analysis, this study analyzes academic literature, ideological interpretations, and the socio-political historical context of Indonesia. The findings reveal three prevailing approaches: the integralistic, the secularistic, and the ethical-substantive model. Both Madjid and Wahid advocate for the ethical-substantive approach, which promotes justice, freedom, and deliberation within a democratic framework, without turning religion into a state ideology. The study concludes that their moderate perspectives are highly relevant for maintaining a balance between religious spirituality and state rationality in a pluralistic society. It is recommended that this ethical-substantive approach be adopted in public policy formulation and inclusive civic education in Indonesia.
References
Abdillah, M. (2013). Hubungan Agama dan Negara dalam Konteks Modernisasi Politik di Era Reformasi. Islamadina: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 14(2), 85-102.
B.J. Boland. (1985). Pergumulan Islam. Jakarta: Grafiti Press.
Bosco Carillo dan Dasrizal (Penyunting). (1983). Aspirasi Umat Islam Indonesia. Jakarta: Leppenas.
Cf. Miriam Budiardjo. (1990). Hak-hak Asasi Manusia dalam Dimensi Global. Jurnal Ilmu Politik, Vol. 10, dan SOA-Informationen, Vol. 1, 4-5.
Didin Komarudin. (2020). Pemikiran Murtadha Muthahhari tentang Fitrah Manusia. Bandung: UIN Sunan Gunung Djati.
Fachry Ali dan Bachktiar Effendy. (1986). Merambah Jalan Baru Islam : Rekontruksi Pemikiran Islam Indonesia Orde Baru (Cet I. Bandung: Mizan.
Greenawalt, Kent. (2002). Constitutional and Statutory Interpretation”. Jules L. Coleman, Kenneth Einar Himma, dan Scott J. Shapiro (editor). The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hafiz, Abdul, dan Muhammad Zuhdi. (2024). Konsep Hubungan Agama dan Negara dalam Kehidupan Masyarakat. Rayah Al-Islam 8, no. 1, 94-105.
Hanafi Pelu & Muh. Zainal. (2022). Interactive Communication through Cas-Cis-Cus Method. Jurnal Ilmiah Nizamia Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, dan Agama Volume 04, No. 2, April, 174.
Harun Nasution. (1985). Perkembangan Modern Dalam Islam. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor. Indonesia.
Ibnu Taimiyah. (2018). Min al-Sunnah, al-Nabawiyyah. Fi Naqd al-Syi’ah Wa al-Qadariyah, Vol. I, 142.
Irwanto, D. (2023). Tradisi Lisan Sebagai Sumber Sejarah. Krinok: Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah dan Sejarah, 2(1), 67-78.
Jamhari. (2020). Pemikiran Nurcholis Madjid tentang Demokrasi dan Negara Islam. Jurnal JIA/Th.
21/no 1/Juni, 100.
Khatibah. (2011). Penelitian Kepustakaan. Iqra': Jurnal Perpustakaan dan Informasi, 5(1), 36-39.
Mansyaur Amin dan Moh. Najib (ed). (1993). Agama Demokrasi dan Transformasi Sosial. Yogyakarta: LKPSM.
Munawir Sjadzali. (1993). Islam dan Tatanegara: Ajaran, Sejarah dan Pemikiran. ed. V;. Jakarta: UII Press.
Norman P. Barry. (1981). An Introduction to Modern Political Theory. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Tarmidzi Taher (ed). (1994). Demokratisasi Politik Budaya dan Ekonomi. Jakarta: Paramadina. Zainal Abidin Ahmad. (1956). Membentuk Negara Islam. Jakarta: Widjaya.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Fastabiq: Jurnal Studi Islam
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
